Jan. 3, 2007
STUDY: Change Needed in Funds for Homeless Families
By Joe Fahy
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
In 2005, when a dispute with a landlord and unpaid utility bills left
his
five-member family on the brink of homelessness, Melahn Chaneyfield
turned
for help to a nonprofit agency, Bridge to Independence.
The agency offered the family a rent-subsidized apartment for up to two
years, plus financial counseling and other services. Since Chaneyfield
moved
in with his wife, Sandra, and three children ages 6 to 13, the couple's
finances have improved so much that they plan to buy their first home.
Theirs is a shining success story, but researchers are concerned that
people
with even worse problems may not be getting the help they need.
The Chaneyfields fit the profile of those who use the greatest share of
temporary housing resources for homeless families, according to a
recent
study that could have profound implications for how those funds are
spent in
the future.
Preliminary findings suggest that in some ways, families using the most
resources have less serious problems, said Dennis Culhane, a University
of
Pennsylvania professor and one of the study's investigators. The
Chaneyfield
family, for example, has not had inpatient care for mental illness or
substance abuse or had a child removed from the home. And both adults
are
working.
"Ironically, we may be spending more money on higher functioning
families
and less money on more needy families," said Philip Mangano, executive
director of the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness.
Mangano said that if the preliminary findings are confirmed,
"obviously,
we'll have to look at how we're literally spending hundreds of millions
of
dollars."
Overall, the federal government spends $4 billion annually on homeless
individuals and families, he said, and at least that much is spent by
state
and local governments and private groups. About half the nation's
homeless
population lives in families, according to the National Alliance to End
Homelessness.
As efforts to address family homelessness gained momentum in the 1980s,
emergency shelters were an early response, Mangano said. Transitional
housing, another type of temporary housing that typically allows
two-year
stays, also was developed.
While those efforts were well intentioned, they often were not based on
research, he said.
More recently, studies have suggested that even the most vulnerable
homeless
people can be placed directly in permanent housing, Mangano said. And
the
latest findings suggest that too many temporary housing resources may
be
targeted to families with less serious problems.
"Even though we have grave concerns about all homeless households, the
reality is that we have limited resources," he said. "We want to make
sure
they are invested in those most in need."
Culhane said the preliminary findings, which have not been published,
are
based on a study in Massachusetts and in New York City, Philadelphia
and
Columbus, Ohio. He agreed to discuss only the Massachusetts findings in
detail, saying they were presented at a conference in October. But
findings
from the three cities were consistent with the Massachusetts results,
he
said.
He and Stephen Metraux of the University of the Sciences in
Philadelphia
analyzed data from a three-month period in 2003 for about 600
Massachusetts
families admitted for the first time to temporary housing programs,
including shelters and transitional housing.
Researchers then tracked case histories for two years and used other
data to
assess whether family members had inpatient mental health or substance
abuse
treatment, or had a child removed from the home by the child welfare
system.
The study found that most families left the temporary housing system
relatively quickly and did not return. Other families, however, came
back
repeatedly or stayed for long periods.
Researchers said the short-term clients made up about 75 percent of
homeless
families served. Their stays cost $11,550, on average, and they used
about
45 percent of the temporary housing system's resources.
Another 5 to 8 percent of families had repeated stays. Those families
-- the
episodic group -- were most likely to have had inpatient mental health
or
substance abuse treatment or a child placed in protective custody.
Their
temporary housing stays cost an average of $21,450, but the group used
less
than 10 percent of the housing system's resources.
The remaining families, long-term residents who made up about 20
percent of
the total, were the most costly of the three groups. They had the least
intensive mental health, substance abuse or child welfare service
histories.
Their average stays cost $48,440, and they used about half the housing
system's resources. Families in the group also were the most likely to
have
jobs.
The findings suggest a major share of temporary housing resources are
directed to families with the "fewest barriers to exiting
homelessness,"
Culhane said.
More should be done to help families with more serious problems, said
Nan
Roman, president of the National Alliance to End Homelessness.
The findings are in some ways the opposite of those reached by an
influential 1998 study of homeless individuals. That study, by Randall
Kuhn
and Culhane, found that individuals with the longest shelter stays
tended to
have higher levels of medical, mental health or substance abuse
problems.
The findings influenced an effort to develop 10-year plans to end
chronic
homelessness in communities around the nation.
Temporary housing programs for homeless individuals tend to be less
structured and have fewer rules than programs for homeless families,
Culhane
said.
Families with less serious problems may have the longest stays in part
because they are better able to comply with program requirements, he
said.
But some families may not need all the case management or other
services
available in temporary housing programs, he said. They might be helped
effectively, and at less cost, through rent subsidies that either
prevent
them from becoming homeless or move them more quickly out of temporary
housing.
Distributed by Scripps Howard News Service, www.scrippsnews.com.