Dec. 3, 2010
COMMENTARY: The Disloyal Opposition
By Joseph J. Honick
In July, 2009, I wrote what turned out to be a legitimate claim that the far right of the GOP was leading a disloyal
opposition to the constitutionally elected president of the United States.
Events since the recent mid-term elections have provided further proof. Worse
this deconstructionism (rather than mere obstructionism) has come amid an
economy that went south under George W. Bush and two wars he pressed
for and for which there appear to be no solutions, strategies or
conclusions.
When I termed the Republican wins as “Arrogance of Victory Minus the Pride”
the point was to demonstrate the winners had no sense of obligation to
the American people, only to the demolition of President Obama’s
administration. And they have now had the chutzpah
to produce a letter for all Republican Members of Congress that pledge
them to obstruct any and all Democratic proposals.
Just to please those phony purveyors of something called “fair and balanced”
news, I have my own problems with the stumblings of President Obama and
made that clear in various articles to this audience. But
I also agreed with Republican assertions when stuff was heaped on W
early on when they claimed rightly we only have one president at a time.
Now, however, with the revelation of a letter that smacks of virtual
political sabotage, stronger language has to be used, especially in
time of war and economic disaster, tainted even more by diplomatic
subversion by some outfit whose goals are up for grabs.
Real American leaders and political leaders of all parties would have called for commitment to unity in behalf of all Americans. The Republican leadership has failed miserably, openly and disloyally. Sadly, the Democratic leadership has also failed to contend courageously, articulately and clearly with these efforts.
There is history for this unfortunately.
When Franklin D. Roosevelt tried to get people to work during deep depression, the right fought it tooth and nail. Not only that, but records of the 74th Congress show that a cabal of extremists of powerful industrialists and
others even wanted to finance the actual overthrow of the Roosevelt
White House and tried to get a former Marine Corps commandant and war
hero, General Smedley Butler, to lead it.
When FDR tried to get a draft going to gear up n view of Hitler’s commitment
to war, the right wing fought it and with tragic consequences.
But, when the war was on, all other bets were off, and both parties committed themselves to winning the war as soon as possible.
Not now tragically, foolishly and perhaps even dangerously.
Nor is it some commitment to something called “conservatism”. What
we have traditionally thought of as conservative and liberal were
pretty much legitimate differences of how the nation should function
but with understanding we are all Americans. Sadly, some today in power claiming to be conservative lean more to a term unfortunately lost to our political vocabulary: reactionary.
(Parenthetically, there is an old saw that liberals want to do everything right now
regardless of cost or anything else; conservatives want to do it all
but just not right now; reactionaries never want to do anything for the
first time, perhaps why they have such a low birth rate!)
It was the late and highly respected conservative spokesman William
Buckley who said he could figure out who the liberals were but could
not understand who the real conservatives were. Perhaps we need to restore the term “reactionary” to our public debates because there are some outstanding conservatives in both parties who must be numbed and embarrassed by the very idea a
political party in time of war and economic distress would have the
gall to publicly announce it will stand in the way of any opposition
proposals regardless of merit or need.
* * *
Joseph J. Honick is a frequent contributor to Huntington News
Network and is president of the international consulting firm GMA
International Ltd., based in Bainbridge Island, WA. This commentary
was previously published in O'Dwyer's PR Report and is reprinted
by permission.