Feb. 20, 2010
COMMENTARY: What Every Citizen Should Now Know About Nukes
By Robert Dodge, M.D.
Nuclear terrorism and the possibility of a nuclear weapon unleashed in
any city present the greatest potential threat to US security, public
health and the economy. Current and future US nuclear policy will be
presented March 1st when President Obama is scheduled to release the
Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) as mandated by congress. This follows the
recent Quadrennial Review of the Department of Defense strategy and
priorities.
The NPR outlines to our allies and the world the US position on the
role nuclear weapons play in our security. President Obama has joined
bipartisan architects of cold war nuclear and security policy, the so
called “gang of four” including former Secretaries of State Henry
Kissinger and George Schultz, former Defense Secretary William Perry
and Former Senator Sam Nunn head of the Senate Arms Services Committee
in stating his vision of a world without nuclear weapons in his speech
delivered in Prague last April. The NPR formulated in consultation
with the Departments of Defense, Energy and State will provide the
opportunity to lay out the means of making this critical vision a
reality.
The NPR of the Bush Presidency modified our nuclear stance in several
critical ways potentially lowering the threshold of nuclear conflict
and war. We expanded our nuclear targeted nations from the cold war
of Russia alone as part of the former USSR, to the now famous 7 nation
“axis of evil”. These included Russia, China, Iraq, Iran, Syria,
Libya, and North Korea. In addition, the concept of preemptive nuclear
strike against a nation having or developing WMD including biologic
and chemical not just nuclear weapons was proposed. This changed the
long-standing Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) doctrine of the cold
war that warned of devastating nuclear retaliation in the event of
nuclear attack upon the US or our allies. Finally, the proposed
development of “usable” nuclear weapons was presented. This resulted
in annual congressional budget battles over the past decade over
weapons such as the Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator (RNEP), the
so-called bunker buster to the Reliable Replacement Warhead (RRW).
The currently awaited NPR provides the opportunity to shift past
policy from a cold war thinking to a vision moving forward that allows
a redirection of critical resources to address current and future
security threats. These threats include so-called “loose nukes” in
the former Soviet States and nuclear proliferation.
Deterrence, Nuclear Non-proliferation and arms control are the three
critical elements needing to be addressed in the current NPR.
The president should declare that the role of current US nuclear
forces is for deterrence only – not for preemptive strike or offensive
use. Secondly abiding by our treaty obligations in the
Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) the US must be committed to nuclear
non-proliferation and in this position committed to the prevention of
nuclear terrorism. Finally the US must be committed to arms control.
There are more than 20,000 nuclear weapons in the world today. These
massive stockpiles of the US and Russia increase the risk of
accidental launch or theft putting every country at risk.
These positions are in keeping with US and global public opinion on
nuclear weapons. They promote the stabilization of international
nuclear order and maintain the US in a credible leadership role as we
move to negotiations on arms control including the new START treaty,
the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and the Comprehensive Test
Ban Treaty (CTBT) all occurring this year.
President Obama has the opportunity to set the forces in motion to
realize his vision of a world without nuclear weapons. The president
and congress need to hear our voices. This is not a partisan or
Democrat / Republican issue, it is a survival issue. The US can and
must lead by example.
* * *
Robert Dodge, M.D. is a Board Member, Physicians for Social
Responsibility Los Angeles (www.psrla.org), Peace and Security
Ambassador – PSRLA, and Board Member, Beyond War (www.beyondwar.org).
This commentary was distributed by PeaceVoice, a program of the Oregon
Peace Institute, Portland, OR.