Dec. 22, 2006
PARALLEL UNIVERSE: Intellectual Diversity? We Don’t Need No Stinkin’
Intellectual Diversity!
By David M. Kinchen
Editor, Huntington News Network
Hinton, WV (HNN) – I’m at the point where I hesitate to open my
bookmarked
FrontpageMag.com site, for fear of what fresh hell (apologies to
Dorothy
Parker) awaits me on the P.C. front.
Sure enough, Roger Kimball has an essay on the Dec. 20, 2006 site about
radical professors fighting back as conservative/libertarian ones – a
tiny
minority – try to establish beachheads of thought at their academic
homes.
We’re talking about prestigious and very expensive private colleges and
universities like Hamilton College in Clinton, NY or Amherst College in
Amherst, Massachusetts, where the $33,000 annual tuition is on a level
with
a similar amount at Harvard. Room and board extra, of course! Hamilton
is
also in the $33,000 range, according to my new 2007 “World Almanac.”
A Midwest equivalent would be Antioch University in Yellow Springs, OH.
On
the Left Coast, Occidental College in the Eagle Rock district of Los
Angeles
is in the same league. Reed College in Portland, OR is a good example
in
the Pacific Northwest. Wonder of wonders: Both Reed and Oxy are in the
$33,000 tuition and fees club!
Kimball, co-Editor and Publisher of The New Criterion and President and
Publisher of Encounter Books, says that “intellectual diversity is
unwelcome
at American universities” with the predominantly left-wing faculty and
administration running what are effectively one-party states: “bastions
of
what the literary critic Frederick Crews called ‘Left Eclecticism.”
Kimball: “At many institutions, you'll find 57 varieties of Marxist,
feminist, post-colonial, deconstructionist, new-historicist animus,
united
by reader-proof prose and a thoroughgoing hostility to traditional
American
values. But you have to look long and hard to find more than token
representation of conservative ideas.”
This point was emphasized this year with my reading and reviewing books
like
David Horowitz’s “The Professors” and – most recently – Elizabeth
Kantor’s
“The Politically Incorrect Guide to English and American Literature.”
There are outposts of conservative/libertarian thought at many elite
universities, Kimball states: “The imbalance is so great that at some
institutions, dissident -- i.e., conservative--faculty members have
created
centers where students and faculty can encounter alternative points of
view.
The James Madison Center at Princeton is one conspicuous example, as is
the
Political Theory Project at Brown and the Center for Freedom and
Western
Civilization at Colgate. Such centers do not alter the fundamental
chemistry
on campus -- nearly all colleges remain reliably left-of-center--but
they do
at least provide a smidgen of reality to all the rhetoric about
diversity.”
Apparently, such centers are too much for the overwhelmingly left-wing
faculty member, he says, pointing to Amherst College, where “ the
political
philosopher Hadley Arkes wanted to start a center for the American
Founding.
He lined up a donor willing to invest $10 million to establish then
Center.
The administration turned down the money. Why? Good question. They had
just
accepted $13 million to establish a Center for Community Engagement,
but
that initiative did not threaten the ideological status quo at what
many now
call the People's Republic of Amherst.”
For the complete article by Kimball, click on
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=26062
I, for one, hope that as the current Baby Boomer generation of hard
left-wing ideologues retires and/or dies off, a younger generation of
academics more tolerant of true intellectual diversity will shift the
balance. I don't want a dictatorship of either left-wingers or
right-wingers. This is my hope and dream and I thank Kimball, Horowitz,
Kantor and many others this year for pointing out the problem in
academe.