Sept. 24, 2006
BOOK REVIEW: ‘Nicole Kidman’ Biography Gives Film Historian David Thomson a
Platform for Alternative Takes on Movies
Reviewed By David M. Kinchen
Huntington News Network Book Critic
Hinton, WV (HNN) – When I heard that David Thomson, my favorite film
historian, had written a biography of Nicole Kidman, I was intrigued and
puzzled at the same time.
Intrigued because Thomson, whose “The Whole Equation: A History of
Hollywood” (Knopf) I reviewed for this site and enjoyed immensely and whose
“The New Biographical Dictionary of Film” (also Knopf, 2002 and due for a
new edition) is in constant use in my TV watching area, would never write a
conventional biography. I naturally requested a review copy. Some have
kidded me that I would read a Thomson version of the San Francisco (where
the British-born Thomson lives with his family) telephone directory. Not
true…. (I think).
“Nicole Kidman” (Knopf, 304 pages, $24.95, illustrations, sources, index) is
pure, unadulterated Thomson. For many readers that would be a turnoff, but
to my quirky way of thinking, it’s pure joy! Thomson loves to create his own
movies, substituting actors and actresses (like me, I sense he hates the
current Hollywood practice of using “actors” for both men and women),
changing the plot, rewriting a film so it satisfies us. After all, aren’t we
the customer and isn’t the customer always right? Why can’t we make changes
and improvements in the product we pay for?
I’ve been accused (and I admit my guilt) of personalizing my reviews, of
often – not always -- putting my own experiences and thoughts into a review.
I did this recently with a review of a book by a former Harvard College dean
and long-time professor about what’s wrong with Harvard and he sent me an
email praising the review, but saying that what I said about Harvard not
being the best choice for everybody had elements of truth in it, even though
it may have overstated the case. I had cited my experience of attending a
fine but not spectacular state university not known for research and how the
presence of actual teachers and not teaching assistants gave me a solid
education in my major (English) and my minor (Industrial Arts). That
odd-ball combination, I might add, later proved invaluable when I was a real
estate editor and writer and was also – briefly – an auto editor and writer.
Thomson gives us the facts on Kidman, born in Hawaii on June 20, 1967 to an
Australian couple studying at the University of Hawaii, growing up as the
“stalky” stringbean of a girl obsessed with TV programs like “Bewitched” and
acting in general. She was a busy young girl, acting in many Australian TV
shows and mini-series. Her breakout role, with Sam Neill and Billy Zane,
was a thriller called “Dead Calm” (1989, directed by Australian Phillip
Noyce). The next year she married Tom Cruise, whom she met playing the
world’s youngest – and prettiest -- doctor, Claire Lewicki in “Days of
Thunder,” directed by Tony Scott, a movie that weirdly foreshadowed the rise
of NASCAR racing great Jeff Gordon. Both Gordon and Cruise have faced
intrusive media questions about their sexual identities.
David Thomson often uses an existing movie as a basis for his own creation,
as I’ve previously noted. Nicole Kidman was great as Faunia in “The Human
Stain,” adapted from the Philip Roth novel. But maybe Kidman is too pretty,
too much of the cover girl to play an abused working class woman who hooks
up with a college professor twice her age. Might not fellow Australian Cate
Blanchett have made a better Faunia? I tend to agree, having seen Blanchett
work wonders with the role of Kevin Spacey’s blowsy, unfaithful doomed wife
in the movie “The Shipping News.”
Blanchett has a terrific range and she never looks the same in every movie
she makes, which I’m afraid can’t be said for Kidman. What about her
Virginia Woolf role in “The Hours,” you ask? You know, with the artificial
nose that didn’t do anything to make the lovely Australian look like the
mostly lesbian English author, but her portrayal won her the best actress
Oscar. Suggestion to David Thomson: Follow up this wonderful book about
Nicole Kidman and the weird process of creating a movie with one on the many
faces of Cate Blanchett, born in Melbourne May 14, 1969. How about Cate
Blanchett in the role of Ada, played by Kidman in “Cold Mountain?” You can
see how this can be a turn off a reader who wants the straight facts – as if
such a thing exists.
The author deals with the usual details of Kidman’s life, including the
breakup of her marriage to Cruise after 10 years, her marriage to fellow
Australian Keith Urban a few months ago and her photo spreads in many
fashion magazines. Thomson suggests that Kidman is rushing to do everything
she can while she’s still in her 30s. After all, next June she’ll be 40, in
a world filled with Scarlett Johanssons (turning 22 in November!), Natalie
Portmans (25) and Emmy Rossums (the latter, just turned 20 – almost exactly
half Kidman’s age and possessed of a great future if she’ll only sing more,
in my not-so-humble opinion!)
Men can look distinguished and have careers in their 40s and even 50s and
beyond in Hollywood, but a woman beyond 40 is past the expiration date in
the minds of most contemporary casting directors. More’s the pity, in view
of the excellent performances recently by Joan Allen, 50, Julianne Moore,
45, Diane Keaton, 60, Blythe Danner, 63, and Meryl Streep, 57, to name
just a few outstanding actresses – excuse me, “women actors” – past 40.
Maybe I’m showing my age, but these seasoned women seem to be aging more
gracefully than their male contemporaries.
That may be the reason why Kidman rushed into projects that didn’t work,
including “The Stepford Wives,” “Bewitched” and “The Interpreter”, Thomson
suggests. She’s also re-imagining photographer Diane Arbus in the upcoming
“Fur.” I’m intrigued by this film, since it has Robert Downey Jr. playing
Lionel, her mentor. When he’s hitting on all eight cylinders, there’s not a
better actor around (see him in “The Singing Detective” directed by Keith
Gordon, based on the Dennis Potter TV series). Diane Arbus doesn’t look a
bit like Nicole Kidman, but who are we to question this strong-willed Aussie
in her choice of roles? I leave that to a better writer, David Thomson! For
the record, I agree with Thomson’s praise of Kidman’s performance as the
crooked Russian woman in “Birthday Girl” and Kidman’s wonderful performance
as Alice in Stanley Kubrick’s last movie, “Eyes Wide Shut.” I also liked her
in “Birth,” which deserves wider showing. Even the best actors and actresses
have a number of clunkers in their resumes — why not Kidman?
Who would want to read “Nicole Kidman”? And all the other books by Thomson?
My not-so-short answer: General readers who want more than a superficial
look at a subject, who desire insights not often found in movie reviews
written under deadline pressure. Film buffs who can’t get enough of quirky
movies like “The Ice Harvest” that I saw the other night on cable. Written
by Robert Benton and Richard Russo (“Empire Falls,” “The Straight Man”),
this 2005 Harold Ramis-helmed film noir featured John Cusack, Billy Bob
Thornton and Oliver Platt and was set in Wichita, Kansas in the Christmas
season. Benton directed Kidman in “The Human Stain.” I’ve never heard of a
movie set in Wichita and I make it a point to see everything Canadian-born
Oliver Platt is in. How’s that for being a quirky film buff?
Near the very end of this book, which I urge everyone who cares about movies
to read, Thomson says: “People ask me anew why I am doing a book about
Nicole Kidman. I tell them there are great things to come, and I hope that I
am right.”
Publisher’s web site: www.aaknopf.com